More on "Professional Boredom"
Melissa Ann Marsh, May 2012
Editor's Note: Perspectives on History welcomes letters to the editor on issues discussed in its pages or which are relevant to the profession. Letters should ideally be brief and should be e-mailed (or mailed to Letters to the Editor, Perspectives on History, AHA, 400 A Street SE, Washington, DC 20003-3889) along with full contact information. Letters selected for publication may be edited for style, length, and content. Publication of letters does not signify endorsement by the AHA of the views expressed by the authors, who alone are responsible for ensuring accuracy of the letters' contents. Institutional affiliations are provided only for identification purposes.
To the Editor:
President William Cronon's essay in the March 2012 issue of Perspectives on History is an excellent article. I have long bemoaned the profession's tendency to drift into boredom in its works. It's largely part of the reason I didn't continue on with my PhD. I was disillusioned with the state of the profession in catering mostly to other academics. We owe it to the general public to contribute our talents to furthering their view of history and how it affects them and the world.
—Melissa Ann Marsh
- Public History, Public Historians, and the American Historical Association
- In Admin: Four History PhDs Discuss Their Alt-Ac Careers
- Making the Case: The Many Venues for Historians’ Advocacy
- For the Record: An Editor's Reflection on the In Memoriam Essays
- Letter to the Editor: On Professional Boredom and Teaching History